How much large language models (LLMs) can aid scientific discovery, notably in assisting academic peer review, is in heated debate. Between a literature digest and a human-comparable research assistant lies their practical application potential. We organize individual tasks that computer science studies employ in separate terms into a guided and robust workflow to evaluate LLMs' processing of academic text input. We employ four tasks in the assessment: content reproduction/comparison/scoring/reflection, each demanding a specific role of the LLM (oracle/judgmental arbiter/knowledgeable arbiter/collaborator) in assisting scholarly works, and altogether testing LLMs with questions that increasingly require intellectual capabilities towards a solid understanding of scientific texts to yield desirable solutions. We exemplify a rigorous performance evaluation with detailed instructions on the prompts. Adopting first-rate Information Systems articles at three top journals as the input texts and an abundant set of text metrics, we record a compromised performance of the leading LLM - Google's Gemini: its summary and paraphrase of academic text is acceptably reliable; using it to rank texts through pairwise text comparison is faintly scalable; asking it to grade academic texts is prone to poor discrimination; its qualitative reflection on the text is self-consistent yet hardly insightful to inspire meaningful research. This evidence against an endorsement of LLMs' text-processing capabilities is consistent across metric-based internal (linguistic assessment), external (comparing to the ground truth), and human evaluation, and is robust to the variations of the prompt. Overall, we do not recommend an unchecked use of LLMs in constructing peer reviews.

Recent advances in the interconnectedness and digitization of industrial machines, known as Industry 4.0, pave the way for new analytical techniques. Indeed, the availability and the richness of production-related data enables new data-driven methods. In this paper, we propose a process mining approach augmented with artificial intelligence that (1) reconstructs the historical workload of a company and (2) predicts the workload using neural networks. Our method relies on logs, representing the history of business processes related to manufacturing. These logs are used to quantify the supply and demand and are fed into a recurrent neural network model to predict customer orders. The corresponding activities to fulfill these orders are then sampled from history with a replay mechanism, based on criteria such as trace frequency and activities similarity. An evaluation and illustration of the method is performed on the administrative processes of Heraeus Materials SA. The workload prediction on a one-year test set achieves an MAPE score of 19% for a one-week forecast. The case study suggests a reasonable accuracy and confirms that a good understanding of the historical workload combined to articulated predictions are of great help for supporting management decisions and can decrease costs with better resources planning on a medium-term level.

Search is a prominent channel for discovering products on an e-commerce platform. Ranking products retrieved from search becomes crucial to address customer's need and optimize for business metrics. While learning to Rank (LETOR) models have been extensively studied and have demonstrated efficacy in the context of web search; it is a relatively new research area to be explored in the e-commerce. In this paper, we present a framework for building LETOR model for an e-commerce platform. We analyze user queries and propose a mechanism to segment queries between broad and narrow based on user's intent. We discuss different types of features - query, product and query-product and discuss challenges in using them. We show that sparsity in product features can be tackled through a denoising auto-encoder while skip-gram based word embeddings help solve the query-product sparsity issues. We also present various target metrics that can be employed for evaluating search results and compare their robustness. Further, we build and compare performances of both pointwise and pairwise LETOR models on fashion category data set. We also build and compare distinct models for broad and narrow queries, analyze feature importance across these and show that these specialized models perform better than a combined model in the fashion world.